As I begin my first post, I am realizing that this project will likely lead me away from the narratives and intended messages of the texts I'll be reading. Often I will be digging into what the literature I am reading says about the authors' sensibilities and his (or her) culture's contributions to that. This is the case with my reading of "the dream of the rood," in that what I take away from it in terms of gender, has less to do with the energy of the narrative than its implications for women in early British society.
This raises all sorts of interesting questions about how God is depicted in scripture, which I see as a pretty close relative to literature, and how much of his qualities and powers and inclinations and laws are shaped by the culturally inscribed values of the people writing about him. I mean, I certainly don't think of God as aggressive or weak or passive or necessarily brave, but the author of the Dream of the Rood used the language he had inherited from his culture to describe the ideal, in God. It seems that the only reason a heavenly mother hasn't been conceptualized much in the world because it would mean that people believed women to be just as capable of power and victory as men. And that would likely mean a complete retooling of what people want victory over in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Have something to add?